Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
The contractor also alleged he was labelled a "snitch" for speaking up over safety issues.View the full article -
From October 1 this year, all newly opened car parks will be required to operate under these new rules. For existing car park operators, they have until the end of 2026 to bring their sites in line. Here are some of the key changes motorists should be aware of: Drivers will be given a 10-minute grace period during which no parking charge can be given Clear signs arerequired to help drivers navigate the car park, and know where they can and cannot park The parking charge cap of £100 is maintained, reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days A new Appeals Charter will create clearer parameters for when motorists can appeal against a parking charge This new code has not been produced by the government, but by the two sector regulators which private parking operators must register with to operate. The new code is a joint project between parking sector regulators the International Parking Community (IPC) and British Parking Association (BPA). Parking fines are changing – here’s everything UK drivers need to know (msn.com) .............................. eh? this seems a spoof? dx -
Tech firms commonly highlight their use of AI, but in some cases it may be exaggerated.View the full article
-
By lookinforinfo · Posted
It seems surprising that the party holders would have invited people to where there was a car park that required Permits to park. Have you contacted the people who held the party to see if they had a facility for those attending the party not to require a Permit or to enter their vrm at the party to avoid the Permit problem. Your letter to the rogues will not deter them from continuing to write to the keeper. It would have been different had you given the name and address of the driver and please do not do that as it gives away a strong defence point for you both. The threats they send through the post and the unlawful demands they ask for over £100 will all count against them should they go to court. They know that Permit Holders only signs do not offer a contract to motorists so you cannot breach a contract that does not exist. That will not stop them sending threatening letters in the hope that you will finally crack and pay them. Probably unlikely that they will take you to Court though they may well go up to the last part-which is paying the Court fee since they know they will lose . I know it is difficult for you both receiving these demands but we see them all the time and realise what a bunch of *************s they all are . They can't even produce a legal document properly after 12 years of practice. saya it all really. -
@eml1980 hows this going dx
-
-
Our picks
-
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.-
- 1 reply
-
-
Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
Hello,
On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
Many thanks-
- 81 replies
-
-
A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,
Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299-
- 161 replies
-
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
Big Motoring World/Motonova finance - sold me MOT failure
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now