Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I hope to get an advise please I learnt about a training course, I decided to to know more about it, I was told it would be £3,000 but I could spread payment for 12 months interet free,  I was very particular that I would not want this proposal to reflect on my credit file, I specifically told them during the Onboarding call that I would be applying for a mortgage and I would not want my Credit score to drop. I was constantly reassured it would just be a "Soft Search" . The Onboarding guy even brought in their Accounts Manager on the phone, who also reassured me it would NOT be a hard search. To my utter shock and dismay, it has come as a HARD SEARCH on my file and my credit score has dropped to confirm my fear 😞 ...  I have already paid 2 months instalments. I contacted the course provider/ Proprietor by message, he refered me to the accounts manager, who responded to me that the finance provider (Pay it monthly) they use is a third party provider, and that they were told it would be a soft search , and this is the 1st time they would be hearing of a "Hard search" on the process. I do not believe this excuse, i think i was just cajoled to sign up , I am highly disappointed, I have finally secured a day next week to speak with the Accounts manager,  After sign up, they have given me access to all the Course packages etc.   I need advise on this missold product and what to say at the online meeting?   Thank you.
    • well i tried to make it a wee bit more understandable as 3 large blocks of text is a bit diff for people to read on small devices. anyway. i didn't really get very far in actually understanding what you want help with even after that...
    • Hi That's great news that it has well IMO been resolved to a certain extent that the Satellite Dish has be aligned properly and you have your Sky Services that you are paying for back. Does that make up for your Loss of Service IMO NO you should be entitled to claim compensation from the Housing Association for this Loss due to the fact: 1. It was the Contractor Employed by the Housing Association working on the Building/Roof that caused the Satellite Dish to be put out of alignment 2. The first Contractor sent by the Housing Association could not access the Satellite Dish as it was on the Roof (which the Housing Association would have been aware of) and needed the keys to access the roof which the Housing Association failed to provide due to there Housing Officer being off work but couldn't be bothered to send another staff member to do this. 3. The Second Contractor was able to access the roof as keys provided by Housing Association and re align the Satellite Dish. The Housing Association are liable for this Loss of Service as it was there Contractor employed by them that initially caused the Satellite outage them further compounded by the next Contractor employed by them not able to fix the dish as they couldn't get access to the roof due to the Housing Association not giving keys then you had to wait for the next Contractor again employed by the Housing Association who was able to access the roof and fix the Satellite Dish. The Satellite Outage length of time to fix was caused by the Housing Association and you must also remember it is YOUR RENT PAYMENTS that are paying for these services of those contractors so just think how much it has cost the Tenants for those 2 Contractors to fix that Satellite dish when it should have been done the first time and who caused the issue the buck stops with the Housing Association.
    • Hi Couple of links of interest for you: Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK   Regulation of supported housing: next steps - Shelter England ENGLAND.SHELTER.ORG.UK The Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023 came into force on 29 August 2023. The Act sets out to introduce changes to how supported exempt accommodation is regulated.   Guide to Supported Accommodation Regulations including Quality Standards (Note: The below link is an automatic PDF Download) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6514400088281e000db4e965/Guide_to_the_supported_accommodation_regulations_including_quality_standards.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Evri lost £100 package - MoneyClaim submitted ***Judgment ***


Recommended Posts

According to my case but when I spoke with the  advisor at MCOL they said they’re working on a backlog. So it might be in the backlog.

Is this something that’s happened before? I’ve been told to wait until the 15th

Link to post
Share on other sites

backlogs are quite std, even more so esp as they are still implementing the new CNBC stuff still

it could be even longer.

you need to read like threads here to understand.

not vanish for a month not reading up.

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

I’ve just come off the phone with MCOL.

They said my case is currently awaiting striking off as they’ve had no response from the defence (EVRi)

They said they still have a backlog  it could take a few more weeks before I get a full update.

But once completed I should receive a full payout for my claim.

DQ sent to EVRi Parcelnet Limited on 09/02/2024

DQ filed on 11/03/2024

Case Stay Lifted on 12/03/2024

General sanctions order was made on 12/03/2024

Case Stay Lifted on 22/03/2024

Case Stayed on 22/03/2024

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no reply to defence?

you mean a strike out of their defence because of no DQ180 return from the defendant EVRI following the court sending them one to them on 2024/02/09?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots here already. read like evri threads

you wont get a payout no BTW..

you'll get a default judgement for claimant in the post from the court.

then evri have 1 month to pay you it (unless the judgement says otherwise)

if not then you'll have to try and enforce it via requesting to the court they send in county court bailiffs 

you cant use HCEO's as the judgement will be less than £600.

dx

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

I wanted to update you and thank you all for your help.

I am delighted announce that after the case was struck out due to no response from Evri,

judgement was issued after I submitted the forms and I was just about to take it to warrant. 

today I received an email from the claims department requesting my bank details to make payment for my full award.

The process has been long since the initial proceedings  in January

i must say your help and guidance has been greatly appreciated.

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence struck out not case struck out...you have judgment 

Well done topic title updated

Regard's

Please consider making a donation if not already to support us to help others.

 

Andy.

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Evri lost £100 package - MoneyClaim submitted ***Judgment ***

This must be part of the new tactic from Evri.  They know they are going to lose. They take it to the wire and then don't bother to turn up in order to save themselves costs and of course they don't give a damn about the cost to the British taxpayer and the extra court delays they cause.

This is a nasty dishonest company – but rather in line with all of the parcel delivery industry which knows that their insurance requirements are unlawful. They know that their prohibited items are for the most part unfair terms. They know for the most part that a "safe place" is exactly what it means – and not left on somebody's doorstep in full view. They know that obtaining a signature means that they have to show the signature not simply claim that they received a signature.
They are making huge profits especially from their unlawful and unenforceable insurance requirement. Although this is less valuable than the PPI scandal, in terms of the number of people who are affected nationwide, PPI pales into insignificance.

I hope the paralegals working for Evri are proud of themselves and they tell their families what they have done during the day when they go home.

  • Like 1
  • I agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...