Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
I think you need to be more direct about what you want out of this and what you're willing to do. We can't keep working in hypotheticals.
-
By honeybee13 · Posted
Larry the No10 cat to Farage on Twitter/X today. 'UK voters were asked whether they wanted to change our parliamentary election system in a 2011 referendum and overwhelmingly opted to stick with first-past-the-post; are you suggesting we should ask again in case they've changed their minds?' -
Based on the facts several potential breaches of contract by King's InterHigh can be identified. I think so. Here’s a detailed analysis: ### Overlapping Subjects Also there were consistent overlaps of subjects, meaning your child had to choose between two lessons occurring at the same time. This issue persisted despite efforts to resolve it. If the contract or school policy guarantees a structured schedule without conflicts, this could constitute a breach of their duty to provide adequate educational services. ### Mock Exams The inability to take mock exams as promised after they were rescheduled due to personal circumstances is significant. This affects the student's preparation for final exams and overall academic performance. If the contract or communications with the school indicated that mock exams would be available at a later date and they failed to honor this, it could be a breach. ### Communication Issues and Final Exams The school's failure to promptly respond to your inquiries about online exams and the complications that arose from this miscommunication, including additional costs and the inability to register your child in time, could indicate a breach of their duty to provide clear and timely information about critical academic processes. ### Access Revocation and Safeguarding Issues Revoking your child's access to classes and materials due to complain and stopped payment, especially before critical exams, is highly problematic. If the school policy or contract does not support such actions, or if it contradicts safeguarding guidelines that aim to ensure continuous access to education, this could be a severe breach. ### Address Update, a child not attending classes as they blocked access dude to reasons upfront and Police Involvement The involvement of the police due to address update issues seems excessive and possibly outside the school's policy scope, especially since you communicated your living situation clearly. This action may also violate privacy or safeguarding policies, as you suggested that home education providers have different standards compared to traditional schools. ### Financial Disputes Withdrawing your child's access to classes for the last two months due to non-payment and retaining the deposit without providing the promised educational services could be seen as unfair. If the school's actions are not supported by the terms outlined in the contract or if they failed to address your grievances properly, this could be another breach. ### Frequent Teacher Changes Frequent changes in teaching staff can disrupt the learning process. If the contract or school policies imply stability in teaching staff and they failed to maintain this, it could be considered a breach of their commitment to provide consistent education. ### Conclusion Given these points, there are several areas where King's InterHigh may have breached their contract: 1. **Failure to provide a conflict-free schedule**. 2. **Failure to honor the rescheduled mock exams**. 3. **Poor communication and failure to facilitate exam registration**. 4. **Revoking access to educational materials and classes improperly**. 5. **Involving police inappropriately regarding address issues**. 6. **Frequent changes in teaching staff**. 7. Constant software issue. 8. All materials for two years were blocked when I came in and said that I would not pay before the complaint would be resolved. And its during GCSE exams. So we can't do exams, as no material to revise and prepare for the last 2 years. Also, the took a 500 deposit to cover the outbalance of 1000£ which I refuse to pay before they solve my complaint. The child becomes upset, anxious, losing interest and belief in herself. I had an emotional stress about all this situation, exams and the police complain. Can I have a refund for two years? Moral compensation? Is it a breach of contract?
-
Our picks
-
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.-
- 1 reply
-
-
Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
Hello,
On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
Many thanks-
- 81 replies
-
-
A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,
Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299-
- 161 replies
-
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf -
-
United Utilities claim for outstanding balance with no move out date
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 941 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.
Recommended Posts