Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Announcement: ESA claimants now have the option of having their WCA recorded


ErikaPNP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Those having a work capability assessment were always able to have an audio recording done - provided that it was arranged and performed in a specific manner and that the claimant met the cost. This was an issue for claimants who simply could not afford the cost of the recordings in the manner accepted, so although it was available, it wasn't really possible for many.

 

Chris Grayling has now announced that all people attending a WCA can have their assessments audio recorded if they so wish:

On audio recording, we will offer everyone who wants it the opportunity to have their session recorded. We decided not to implement universal recording because, based on the trial experience, people did not want it. Few people wanted their sessions recorded, and some said that they definitely did not. We decided therefore to offer recording as an option to those who want it. That seems entirely sensible.

 

>>>>source

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes - I just noticed nolegion's post just now. He has done very well in his research, I was following his thread in its earlier days. I've also asked our newsletter authors to include this in the next edition to ensure that the word is spread to as many as possible.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Briliant idea, the thing is to get the vast majority of claiments (or is it customers) to get it done and to let them know they need it for their own protection, and it's not big brother trying to catch them out (like ATOS do). It should save the taxpayer £1000000s on tribunals if it makes ATOS tell the truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, Count Orlok. It will be interesting to see the interaction between the Atos printout and the recording.

 

I would have had my assessent recorded whether I trusted them or not, because I was so nervous I could hardly remember it afterwards.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read the whole debate, and it was very interesting indeed. I think it's about time that claimants had the choice of having their assessments recorded. I didn't read anything about if they would get a copy of the recording at the end of the assessment, or if they had to request it at a later date depending on if they where granted ESA or not, and wanted to appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, now lets campaign for it to be applied retrospectively as part of an appeal, anyone failing the assessment who believes they should have passed and has concerns over the way the test was conducted, can apply to re-take the assessment and have it recorded, why not go the whole hog and make video/audio recording an option?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be better if it was video'd and the client got a copy. That way if the client has problems sitting, bending, getting up and and off the couch etc, at the assessment and the assessor had put down that the client had no problems, it would clearly show the assessor was not telling the truth.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this starting straight away? and have to arrange it before the date?

 

It's not yet known whether it will need to be arranged before the WCA date but I would think so, as presumably they will need to have the recordings performed in a particular way so will need it to be set up. DWP will need to update their literature that they send to claimants because currently the literature tells the claimants that they need to meet the cost. Until the literature is updated and guidance publically available, I would suggest that anyone who wishes to have their assessment audio recorded either makes this known when sending their ESA50 or otherwise writes to ATOS (get proof of posting) to request it beforehand.

 

If I hear more, I'll let everyone know.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It should be made compulsory to vidio the assesment. I had mine in december and was not told i had the option to have it recoreded. The assesor failed to put it down that i passed out and had to be helped into and out of the chair. She said i was 100% fit desbite the job centre doing a 6 week assesment on me a month earlier which said i was unfit for work. My money got stopped. Im now having to survive on my DLA money which is only £78 a month as the job centre wont pay me either due to their assesment saying i cant work. Its the 2nd time they have done this to me. Last time they passed me fit for work just cause i was able to get to the assesment. But if i failed to turn up they would of stopped my money as well. So its a no win situation. My appeal failed last time cause they refused to let my doctor attend to give them my medical info which would prove i was unable to work. Even the job centres report was refused as proof i was unable to work. They put the wrong address on the letter to say i failed the test this time so i didnt get the letter with the appeal form in until after the deadline to get the appeal in. The 1st i knew about them stopping my money was when housing benefit rang me to ask what money im getting now my benefit has stopped. I then rang the ESA ppl to find out what was going on. But they were of no help at all. Ive told them loads of times they have the address wrong but they refuse to change it cause they say they have it right cause the post office confirmed it. If thats true why is the post office been in contact with me to tell them to get the address right lol. They have the wrong speeling for my rd and the wrong post code. So it takes weeks for letters from the ESA to reach me. I think their doing it on purpose to make sure i cant get appeals in on time. The form i sent into the ESA before the assement was filled iin by my GP. She put down i have blackouts and passout a lot and i have a lot of trouble walking standing up and sitting. But the ESA report said i had no troubl with any of the things the GP put down. So its not just ATOS not reporting things its the ESA finding any excuse to get ppl of benefits. I dont think the ESA r even reading the ATOS reports. They have decided already who will get benfits and who wont. Ive had nothing but trouble with the DWP for about 20 years. They r always stopping my money and making excuses why it was stopped. I even got kicked out of my council flat due to my benefits being stopped and ended up living on the streets. Thats hard at the best of times. But when u have a knackerd spine and agrophobia its a hell of a lot worse. I was lucky as my GP stepped in and got me into a homeless hostel on medical grounds within a few days. My GP has contacted a lawyer on my behalf to take the DWP to court to get my money back plus back pay and compo. Ive now been told that my work aessment is going to be reviewed again lol. But that letter took 3 weeks to arrive as they still have the wrong address despite my lawyer, GP, council and job centre telling them they have it wrong. But they did say if they cant reverse the decision they will allow me to appeal where before they said i couldnt cause i didnt get the form in by the deadline. The whole system is geared to get ppl off sick benefit to meet the cutbacks. They dont give a stuff if ppl's lives get ruined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

There's a recent thread about this. I think I'm right in saying that the DWP have agreed to recording, but are still deciding how it will work. I'll have a look for the thread.

 

I haven't read all of your post because it's a solid block of text and does my eyes in, I'm afraid.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's hope these recording of WCA dont end up on a memory stick and left on a Train.

 

Or in the hands of The Sun or Daily Mail :-x

  • Confused 1

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for you Rocker60, I know what it is like to get the DWP to change addresses, I have been receiving DWP, Child Benefit, and HMRC letters addressed to someone else, that has never in the past, now of ever will live at my address. I have telephoned their offices every time I get a letter, (well I have to open them to get the phone number to try and tell them) we have had everything, including Debt Collection companies writing. Parcels, packets, letters, you name it we have had it. Dispite letters, phone calls personal visits to Jobcentre Plus office, we are still getting them. I wrote a letter of complaint to the manager of our local office and he replied that it had now been changed. 5 days later I got yet more letters addressed to her, so now big bold writing on the envelopes, "return to sender"

I have even had letters from DWP with Uncrossed Giro Cheques in...... I was told unofficially

 

by a worker there that they only update their address and postcode databases once a year..... how much money is being wasted with all this. My last letter sent to them told them that now for every letter I get i will send them a bill for £10 to cover my time and expenses.... doubt they would pay anyway... could take them to S C court......

 

I would love to see video recordings of the ATOS interviews, a disabled friend of mine who is in a wheelchair was sent an appt and when he got there he could not get through the door into the building, so ATOS told DWP he "Failed to attend" so they stopped his benefits, when he complained in his local Job Centre Plus office they were sympathetic and put them into place as he can't even turn his own wheelchair wheels as his hands are deformed and he had his carer with him pushing him when he went to the ATOS and the JC+ offices.

 

They then sent him another ATOS medical and they put on his report that he could read and write??? and was able to walk ok, (he has had polio since birth and has never walked in his life...... ) another complaint and appeal started, but in the meantime they have stopped ALL his benefits again, and the council are now threatening to evict him........

 

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry about not having paragraphs. But i dont know how to do them. Ive had loads of ppl trying to teach me. But i just cant understand it.

 

When you reply, you need to press the enter key (this is the big button above the shift key and next to the ] and # keys. Press once for a new line and press again for a new paragraph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you reply, you need to press the enter key (this is the big button above the shift key and next to the ] and # keys. Press once for a new line and press again for a new paragraph.

 

 

Thats why i love this forum...thank you very much for explain...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a friend who has scored the big fat 0 in her ATOS assessment even though her condition affects her mobility, general well-being and mental health.

She is going to appeal alongside support but I am wondering if she can demand a re-test that is recorded as she says that 99% of the report is made up or issues that are extremely irrelevant missed out, she did have a witness to her assessment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dilizjo the simple question is why the hell would they want to do that?

 

The weakness of the report is one of the things that you argue about and very often it's the substandard nature of these reports that helps you win the appeal.

 

Demanding a retest will do what exactly?

 

Well you'll probably now have two shoddy reports to fight against (if they both come out the same you're in a far worse position). Plus the DWP will most likely (even if you win at tribunal)l try and pull the claim back to the date of the 2nd Assessment (if it's a failure) and disallow ESA from that date thus you're back at square 1.

 

The assessments a crock of **** I'm Nil Points from 2 so far! But it's shoddiness in a way is most helpful!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a friend who has scored the big fat 0 in her ATOS assessment even though her condition affects her mobility, general well-being and mental health.

She is going to appeal alongside support but I am wondering if she can demand a re-test that is recorded as she says that 99% of the report is made up or issues that are extremely irrelevant missed out, she did have a witness to her assessment

 

Hi,

 

Sorry to read that your friend 'scored nil points'. It's par for the course with 99% of claimants.

 

Your friend can't really 'demand' anything.

 

She can however, put an appeal in.

 

Download form here -

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Diol1/DoItOnline/DG_4017514

 

Appeal process thread here -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-information(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...