Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest in Ireland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5525 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning all,

 

God, I wish I had found this site a few years ago!!

 

Any way, my little tale of woe:

 

Around 6 years ago I had a loan out with HSBC, whilst I was living with my Ex-Fiancée in the UK. The loan was of around 10K I think (that long ago, I can’t remember) Any way, we split in a rather nasty way, and we put the house up for sale. And during the time the house was on the market I was in Prague with work, and met my now wife, and now mother to my 1st Child (ahh) Any way, she is Irish, and lived in Ireland, and after a few months of back and forth, I decided to move over to Ireland, where we both now happily live.

 

The house in the uk was eventually sold, and my Ex was kind enough to take me to court for half the proceeds, even though she never paid a penny to the mortgage, bills ect. In the end we settled between our solicitors and she came away with a good few quid, As did I, but not as much as I thought I would get. In the mean time I had a letter from a debt collection agency (can’t remember name) stating they now owned the debt, and I need to pay them. I did, in dribs and drabs, and then didn’t pay anything for a while as I just didn’t have the funds. After a while I eventually received a letter from our dear friends capquest with the usual, we’re coming after you and your belongings blah, blah. To which had the desired effect as I pooped myself and got in contact.

 

I have never given them my phone number but after speaking to them on the phone, ( me calling them, silly boy, I know) I agreed to pay £200.00 per month. Which I did, but more by-monthly, than monthly. I had a few letters from their legal department, threating the usual. My last conversation to them was last week to say that I simply couldn’t afford to pay them as I had been using my credit card to do so, and I don’t have anything left on it.

 

I just wanted to ask when I go from here, as the debt stands at €7775 even after all the payments made. Do I still send a CCA, even though I have been making payments?

 

And what jurisdiction do they have in Southern Ireland???

 

I also revived another one from a TV I brought from Curries from Themes credit limited, with €209.86. The last payment made on that was 2004. And again, I stupidly called them, and they are sending out a payment plan.

 

Help….please

 

Thank you in advance,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send them a CCA. Make them prove they are entitled to chase you for the money. Do the same to Thames when they send you a demand.

 

Its highly unlikely that eithe Capquest or Thames will pursue you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are outside their jurisdiction. They prefer to use Northampton Bulk Court because its simple. However it has no jurisdiction in Scotland or Northern Ireland and sure as hell could not be enforced in the Republic. So not only have you cheap Petrol but are unlikely to be bothered by Crapquest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies. I will get the letters of tomorrow. Recorded delivery and postal order, right?

 

The petrol was cheap over here, but going up. But the shock at the prices back in the UK are :eek:.

 

I'll keep ye posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies. I will get the letters of tomorrow. Recorded delivery and postal order, right?

 

The petrol was cheap over here, but going up. But the shock at the prices back in the UK are :eek:.

 

I'll keep ye posted.

If you are close to the border it would be better to use Royal Mail and a sterling postal order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'm not near border. And out of intrest what differance would it make?
None whatsoever I just thought it would be one less excuse for Capquest and Thames. In fact if you never responded to them I hardly think they would bother you other than send a load of computer generated threats

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

An update for you, plus advice...

 

Capquest have written back saying that they are looking for the relivant documents, and if I would be so kind as to send over any documentaion I have relating to the loan with HSBC.

 

I am taking this that they do not have the documents, and wopuld like me to send them to their office! No way Pedro. They are not asking for any money for 28 days though.

 

So with that one, I will leave as is, and see what they come back with.

 

Now onto the smaller one, with Thames credit. Here is what they have written:

 

"We are not the original creditor. We did not provide you with the original credit facility. We purchased your outstanding debt balance and right to collect that balance, together with the right to apply interest in accordance with your original credit agreement. We did not purchase your actual agreement, consequently we have obligation to provide you with a copy of that agreement.

 

How ever, as a measure of good practice we will seek to obtain a copy of the original agreement from your original creditor, and if that is available we will send it thru to you.

 

IN the mean time, unless you are specifically denying that you have knowledge of this debt, or you are denying libel for the debt, there is no reason why our debt collection against you should be suspended.

 

We are now the legal owners of your account, and your liability is now with us.

 

Please make the necessary payments via".. Blah. Blah.

 

 

 

I'm a bit confused as they say they have no obligation to provide the agrement, yet they are going to request it.

 

 

 

 

Any thoughts, should I just wait to see what they come back with?

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now onto the smaller one, with Thames credit. Here is what they have written:

 

"We are not the original creditor. We did not provide you with the original credit facility. We purchased your outstanding debt balance and right to collect that balance, together with the right to apply interest in accordance with your original credit agreement. We did not purchase your actual agreement, consequently we have obligation to provide you with a copy of that agreement.

 

How ever, as a measure of good practice we will seek to obtain a copy of the original agreement from your original creditor, and if that is available we will send it thru to you.

 

IN the mean time, unless you are specifically denying that you have knowledge of this debt, or you are denying libel for the debt, there is no reason why our debt collection against you should be suspended.

 

We are now the legal owners of your account, and your liability is now with us.

 

Please make the necessary payments via".. Blah. Blah.

 

 

Translation into English (or Irish as it is the same in this case):

 

"We haven't got anything and can't touch you but thought we try it on just in case you pay up!"

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a shame that Crapquest's 'good practice' doesn't include not lying about their responsibility to produce the agreement whether or not they are the original creditor under s.189 the CCA 1974. It defines a creditor as: ‘the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement, or the person to whom his rights and duties have passed by assignment’. The legislation is quite clear - rights and duties - there is no element of choice, and it is not possible for only the rights to be assigned. So, even if they didn't lend the money in the first place, they are still a creditor.

 

And you do have cheap petrol, compared to those of us in Northern Ireland. Mind you, it seems our shops are cheaper than yours, judging by the number of ROI-registered cars in all the shopping mall car parks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks guys for the replies, and sorry for the delay in saying thanks, I've been laid up sick for the past few weeks, and just recovering.

 

I did not call or write to either after the letters arrived, and then last week I received a letter from both of them on the same day. Very kind of them.

 

The Thames Credit ltd, or River Rats, as I now prefer to call them (thanks ODC) letter is basically saying that I am due to make a payment to them, and that they have tried to contact me by phone. (This is incorrect, but I'm happy they have not called, saves me having to hang up on them)

They go on to say that their call was purely out of courtesy to remind me that the payment is due within the next few days, and they have included a pre0paid envelope for my convenience. (Not included by the way)

 

Do I take it that I just ignore this letter, as they did not oblige under S 175 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to pass your request for a CCA on the original creditor?

 

The second letter from Crap Quest:

“We are writing with reference to request for further information on the above account.

 

We can confirm that we have requested the information from HSBC, however we are still waiting a response. Your account is currently on hold , and any interest being applied is frozen.

 

We will contact you again within 28 days to advise of the situation.

 

If HSBC respond to us within that time period, we will contact you immediately to resolve this matter.

 

Yours sincerely,”

 

Where do I stand here, did they not have to supply the information with in a set time from receiving the CCA from myself?

 

Thank you again guys, for your time answering my Q’s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The become in default if they do not supply the CCA within 12 working days. They commit a summary offence if after a further calendar month they do not produce.

 

However I am not awaare of any DCA being prosected for non compliance.

 

They are waffling and they know it. They obviously computer generate their nasty letters as they should know that a prepaid envelope from the UK would be useless in the Republic of Ireland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey ODC, that was quick. Thanks.

 

So because neither of them have produced the CCA with in the 12 working days, they are now in default, what does this mean to me and the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means that they cannot enforce it nor demand money from you for it. If they make any demands for money without supplying you with your CCA then you should normally report them to TS but as you are living outside the UK this is rather pointless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had two contacts from Capquest on different accounts; in both cases they failed to comply with the CCA, but as soon as I pointed out that this meant that they couldn't enforce, they passed the file back to the OCs.

 

I have no experience of Thames Credit, but suspect that they are just following a standard cycle of computer-generated letters, so their only costs are for postage. There will be a cut-off point at which they realise it's not worth pursuing.

 

The Threat-O-Matic ™ is a wonderful device, but it does sometimes operate in a different reality to the rest of the world. Thus, we see it able to send letters addressed to to the former address of someone who has lived abroad for some years, in which they are grandly informed that the DCA has now confirmed that they are still resident at their old home; letters in which an individual is informed that myriad attempts have been made to contact him by phone, whilst he has noticed the instrument chiefly for its silence; letters which entreat the receiver to telephone the DCA so that he may be helped, when all but the most educationally challenged knows that the opposite is true. Your example of being informed that you were due to make a payment is but another example of this interruption to the space/time continuum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

 

So what should I do from here? Just sit and wait untill they give in?

 

ScarletP: You said that the DCA sent the debt back to the OC's (original creditors right?) What did they then do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ScarletP: You said that the DCA sent the debt back to the OC's (original creditors right?) What did they then do?

 

HSBC sent a risible letter in which some cretin spluttered about continuing to pursue because their LEGAL DEPT (their caps) had told them they could, but actually they have done nothing whatever. None of the others have tried again either.

 

So, sit and wait, as ODC says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

 

The River Rats are now p*ssing me off. They phoned the house on Friday, and my wife answered, I was out and she told the person on the phone that. Then they asked for my mobile number, she then asked who they where and he said he was calling from Themes, she then copped who and gave them a wrong mobile number.

The the cheeky git phones her back and has a go at her for giving the wrong number. My blood is boiling at the moment... She told him not to call again, and to write if they have anything to say.

 

Then this morning the home phone ring I answer it and its them again, I said I don't wish to speak with them at this time, and can they please write to me with anything they need to say. He kept intrupting me asking for my DOB. I take it this is so he knows its me??? Any way I just hung up. And now the phone has been ringing on and off for the past 5 minutes...

 

I take it I just continue to ignor, and if I do pick up and its them, do I just hang up, or do I yell them I have not recived CCA??

 

Thanks,

 

A very anoyed, Pip

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...